| Thursday, May 18th, 2006 |
Author: Libby Ingrassia |
| Please Get Serious, America: Reuters "Senate panel OKs gay-marriage ban" |
Time: 01:10:47 PM |
| Comments? Add / Read (4) |
Location: |
A Senate panel advanced
a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage on Thursday as the committee
chairman shouted "good riddance" to a Democrat who walked out
of the tense session.
"If you want to leave, good riddance,"
Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter told Wisconsin Democratic Sen.
Russell Feingold, who refused to participate because, he said, the meeting
was not sufficiently open to the public.
"I've enjoyed your lecture too. See
you later, Mr. Chairman," Feingold told the Pennsylvania Republican
before storming out. The testy exchange highlighted tensions over the proposal,
which would amend the U.S. Constitution to prevent states from recognizing
same-sex marriages. Reuters
"Senate panel OKs gay-marriage ban"
Putting aside for the moment what I believe
should happen to this bill (difficult though that is, as I have some strong
opinions), is this really what the Senate should be focued on right
now? We're at war, still, in Iraq; we've got a serious diplomatic negotiation
(or three) going in in Iran; half the country is up in arms over immigration
issues; we have to decide how to deal with the Hamas-led government in
Palestine; there is still havoc and worse happening in the Sudan... and
our Senate spends its time worrying about a constitutional ban on
same sex marriage? Talk about insecurity and wagging
the dog.
Please America, focus.
Permanent Link to this entry: Permanent Link
| Saturday, May 6th, 2006 |
Author: Libby |
| Rules for Writing (adapted from Dr. Dennis Huston’s lectures) |
Time: 05:22:58 PM |
| Comments? Add / Read (8) |
Location: procrastinating |
You all know I'm in grad
school (probably, anyway). You
also know that I love to write and have been an editor for many years.
Even editors can improve their writing and editing skills, however, and
one of my professors, Dr. Dennis Huston, has helped me to do so this year.
Dr. Huston spends at least an hour of the first class (each first class)
talking about his specific rules for writing. In working with these rules
this year, I've been able to apply them to almost anything I write or edit
-- they improve the clarity and style despite some the fact that some of
the "rules" are specifically Dr. Huston's pet peeves. The list
below is adapted from notes taken in his classes over two semesters. I
hope it's useful to help you improve your writing.
Please note that there's a lot more to
good writing than what's contained in these rules. If you're really trying
to learn to write well, the cardinal rule is to revise and edit as many
times as you can stand, let someone else with a good eye look at the paper
to edit it, and then edit a few more times. I've heard it said that the
difference between good writers and great writers can be found in the number
of times they edit their work before making it public. Of course, you have
to know what to look for when you edit. Beyond the the suggestions in this
list, you might also try some books like Strunk
and White's Elements of Style, Zinsser's
On Writing Well, or Shertzer's
Elements of Grammar (just to name
a few - if you really want a more exhaustive, annotated list, let me know
-- I've got a shelf-full of books on grammar, writing, and editing and
have opinions on most of them!).
- Identify borrowed ideas from whence they
came (particularly appropriate considering the current plagiarism scandals)
- Make references to specific actions or
quotes in the text as evidence (this advice is mostly about literary criticism,
but if you're writing about something else, "evidence" is still
necessary)
- Exactly reproduce lines/quotes from the
text (related to the identifying borrowed ideas concept -- if you're quoting,
quote; if you're paraphrasing, you must still give credit for the idea
in some way.)
- Natural language is good (putting on language
that is too academic or technical is usually unnecessary - when you have
to use a technical term or phrase, define it; write so that you can be
understood)
- Cliches, colloquialisms, and swearing are
bad (again, this advice is about literary criticism, but it's also good
to consider the use of any of these "devices" when you do use
them -- what do they add to your writing? used when appropriate, they can
add something; used reflexively or habitually, they're annoying)
- Try to write perfect spoken English --
read your paper aloud to make sure it sounds like good spoken English (consider
the "natural language" advice above...)
- Don't write more than 2 sentences that
begin with the subject (Subj Verb Obj sentence structure) -- this structure
is boring if used too much, and sounds like a written monotone (this advice
is dr. huston's big personal pet peeve. while there will be times when
it makes sense to ignore this advice - especially if you're not taking
dr. huston's class - you'll find that there are more reasons to take the
advice to heart -- variation in the sentence starters forces you to pay
attention to your logical progression through your paper and create the
transitions that are so important -- more on this idea below)
- Vary sentence length and structure (more
of the same -- don't write all short or all long sentences; it is more
effective to mix sentence types, length, and structure the same way you
vary your volume and tone when you speak)
- Be wary of absolute statements (there are
many shades of gray in the world and in literature. when you speak or write
without acknowledging these, you are setting yourself up)
- Voice - create a speaking (writing) voice
that seems real -- write with yourself as the audience, in a critical but
not unfair mood
- Dr. Huston likes dashes (so do I) -- use
to insert a sentence within a sentence
- Get rid of passive voice -- choose active
verbs (while there may be reasons and times to use linking verbs and passive
voice, I've found that they're few and far between -- make your words work
for a living and identify who's doing what to whom; save the passive voice
and linking verbs for when you cannot avoid them or whenyou actually need
them.)
- Transitions are very important -- think
about each sentence as a transition, building logically from
the beginning of the paper to the end (i've come to believe that this advice
serves all writers well; use it to improve not only your writing, but your
actual logic/argument as well.)
- Avoid "This" without a noun (should
be self-explanatory, but if you say: "this is true," for example,
I want to know what "this" is -- this argument? this advice?
this sentence? etc)
- Avoid
"Due to" (most of us use
this construction incorrectly - because or since should usually be your
substitute)
- Don't write more than 2 prepositional
phrases in a row (makes your sentences
too wordy...)
- Other ways to start sentences: subjective
conjunction (if, when, because, while); adverb (however, then); coordinating
conjunction (and, but, or, for, nor, yet, so); prepositional phrases, participial
phrases, infinitives, gerunds, noun clauses, object of the sentence first,
fragments, questions (this advice goes with the idea of transitions and
with the advice to vary sentence structure/starters... you should google
these items if you need help figuring out what they are -- there are a
lot of good examples out there; i've got more on "sentence starters"
that I'll post another time...)
Permanent Link to this entry: Permanent Link
| Friday, May 5th, 2006 |
Author: Libby |
| AIDS prevention PSA |
Time: 04:45:17 PM |
| Comments? Add / Read (0) |
Location: Margo and David's |
My friend Cindy sent me this and I just
had to share. Consider it my good deed (public service announcments count!)
for the week.
You'll
have to click through an ad or two if you're not a Salon junkie like me,
but this French
AIDS-prevention PSA is worth it. If
you'd rather find it elsewhere, just Google "Wilfred Brimo" and
look for references to "Sugar Baby Love."
I repeat, this is *not* work-safe.
It's animated, but pretty explicit at times.
I so dig a happy ending...
Permanent Link to this entry: Permanent Link
| Tuesday, May 2nd, 2006 |
Author: Libby Ingrassia |
| Interview meme via Jonvon |
Time: 05:25:09 PM |
| Comments? Add / Read (5) |
Location: home |
I can't believe you guys weren't all much
more "fibby" considering how haiku-y you have been in the past.
But, ok. So, Jonvon posted an interview meme a while ago and I said I was
game, so here are my answers to Jonvon's questions:
1. How
many books have you written and had published? What were they called? Why
did you start writing them? (Sorry I don't know if there was one or more
than one.)
On my own, I've got three publishing (book) credits as author, and a few
more as technical editor or co-author. The books are all
listed here, although I'm currently
working on a new book that's not listed. Why did I start writing? A friend,
Mike,
who is the author of a best-selling A+ certification book
suggested my name to his then-editor, Judy Brief (now Judy Bass). I'd always
wanted to write a book, so it was a moment of perfect opportunity.
2. What
is your area of focus with your masters degree studies?
I'm in a Master
of Liberal Studies program at Rice
University. The program is interdisciplinary
-- I'm mixing classes between science, social science, and humanities,
although I plan to focus in the humanities.
3. How
did you get into yoga?
I actually have to give my ex full credit for talking me into my first
yoga classes. But then when we moved to San Diego, I started taking yoga
on the beach and got addicted to how it makes me feel.
4. Why
are you drawn to haiku?
Haiku requires so much attention to word choice that it really focuses
what you're trying to say. In addition, although most of us only pay attention
to the top layer of a haiku (it's syllables), there's really so
much more to the form, including
techniques like association, contrast, association, riddle, etc. Part of
what I like is the puzzle -- the same reason I like the Fib
-- but part of what I like is the
complexity stuffed into such a small form.
5. What
countries have you been to? Which one was your favorite?
Wow -- good question. I've been keeping a list of countries, so here it
is:
USA
Canada
Mexico
Ireland
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Switzerland
France (Paris, Nice (10/03), and also: St. Martin, an island dependency
of France (Guadaloupe)).
Netherlands (Amsterdam, den Haag, and also St. Maarten, a island dependency
of the Netherlands)
China
Japan
UK (including Hong Kong (I was there pre-1997) Bermuda, Anguilla, both
of which are British dependency islands)
Jamaica
Vatican City
Macao (Portuguese overseas territory)
Monaco (Monte Carlo, as of 10/03)
Germany (Frankfurt and Kassel, 11/03)
Denmark (Copenhagen, 10/04)
Belize (December, 2003)
Added per the Travelers' Century Club's list of countries:
Hawaiian Islands
Anguilla
Leeward Islands (Netherlands) -- St. Maarten
Leeward Islands (French) -- St. Martin
Bermuda
Hong Kong
| |
As for my favorite... that's a tough one.
I think Ireland is very high on the list -- and I'll be going there again
this summer to confirm it. :-)
6. If
you had to pick one author to take with you to an island, who would it
be? (The book(s) of course, not the actual author. ;-)
Oooh, yet another toughie, Jonvon. There are so many writers whose works
I can read, and read, and read, and read. I'd be torn between JRR Tolkein,
Robrt Heinlein, Shakespeare, and Jane Austen, I think.
You know the drill, I hope -- if you want
me to interview you, too, just post a comment. I'll give you some questions,
which you'll then answer on your blog/LJ and give others the chance to
be interviewed as well. If you don't have a blog, you can answer in the
comments, too, of course. :-)
Thanks, Jonvon, and sorry for the slow response.
Permanent Link to this entry: Permanent Link
|